MVP Development en Geneva
How we work in Geneva
In an MVP, the approval workflow is dead weight
Two or three people who talk every day need neither states nor permissions: they need someone who decides quickly. We sell content governance in the other services and we still advise against it here, because every layer of review costs you learning cycles, and learning cycles are the only thing an MVP produces.
Permissions inside the product cannot be left for later
A different matter altogether is your product having roles inside it: client, administrator, technician, guest. That is not configuration, it is the data model, and adding it once there are users means touching almost everything. Tu Garaje Virtual is a product of ours, and there permissions are not an extra: they are a large part of the product.
One decision, one person
We ask that there be someone able to decide without consulting anyone. In an MVP, a decision that takes two weeks costs more than the feature it blocks, and a committee of three turns every question into a meeting. Once the product takes off there will be time to share out the authority properly.
When to stop improvising
There are three signals and they are worth recognising: the first person who publishes something without being in the daily conversation, the first content an outside client sees, and the first time somebody asks who changed this. When the second one appears, it is time to sit down and divide up permissions, and it is no longer premature.
Answering your questions
What people ask us about MVP Development in Geneva.
If your question is not here, tell us about the project and we will answer with real context.
Ask us directlyReal work
Projects we have built
Full service · All the detail
MVP Development: stack, process, use cases and FAQs